IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v19y2014i5p569-592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Charting a Changing Waterfront: A Review of Key Schemes for Perth's Foreshore

Author

Listed:
  • Julian Bolleter

Abstract

Twenty-one years have elapsed between an international design competition held for the redesign of Perth's Swan River foreshore and the commencement of construction of a small, but significant, section of the this river's edge. This extended period of design proposition allows an opportunity to reflect on trends in waterfront design in Perth, and shifting notions of what Perth is, and could be, as expressed by the proposals. Trends identified include a growing appreciation of urban values, increasing aspirations to produce symbolic capital, increasing production of stylized urban imagery and the corresponding dominance of the architectural discipline. Perth's foreshore has been until recently a vast expanse of typically unoccupied, turfed parkland. Analogous to a scaled-up suburban 'front yard', its role has been typically symbolic rather than functional. As such, schemes for the redesign of this foreshore, and subsequent public reactions, also tend to reveal aspects of Perth's collective identity. While the 1991 competition-winning scheme recreated a naturalistic landscape on the foreshore, later state government-endorsed schemes in 2008 and 2011 proposed the urbanization of the foreshore at significant densities. These recent schemes reflect, and have forged, a growing desire for urbanity in Perth.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian Bolleter, 2014. "Charting a Changing Waterfront: A Review of Key Schemes for Perth's Foreshore," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 569-592, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:19:y:2014:i:5:p:569-592
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2014.943703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2014.943703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2014.943703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:19:y:2014:i:5:p:569-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.