IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v19y2014i1p89-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Participation, Design Competition and the Product in Urban Design: Insights from the Orange County Great Park

Author

Listed:
  • Ajay Garde

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of citizen participation and urban design competitions to the quality and outcomes of urban design projects. Urban design projects sometimes involve citizen participation and a design competition before a proposal is accepted for implementation. Although there is considerable literature on citizen participation and on design competitions, there is scant empirical research on the implications of the process for the product. A case study approach was used, in which the author evaluated data collected from a multi-phase citizen participation process and an international design competition for the design of the Great Park in Irvine, California. The design elements proposed by citizens during the citizen participation process and those proposed by the professionals in their competition entries were analyzed for their contribution to the quality of design of the project. The research reveals that, while these processes consume considerable financial and non-financial resources, the citizen participation by itself contributes commonplace ideas and is inadequate for achieving excellence in urban design projects. The paper concludes with recommendations to make the process more effective to achieve optimal results for the product.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajay Garde, 2014. "Citizen Participation, Design Competition and the Product in Urban Design: Insights from the Orange County Great Park," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 89-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:19:y:2014:i:1:p:89-118
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2013.854697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2013.854697
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2013.854697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:19:y:2014:i:1:p:89-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.