IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v50y2024i6p901-916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sisonke: A Critical Appraisal of South Africa’s Covid-19 Vaccine Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Hodes

Abstract

When South Africa’s Covid-19 pandemic emerged in March 2020, scientists mobilised quickly and effectively to parse and produce evidence to inform the state’s response. South Africa became a site for numerous Covid-19 vaccine trials. While many publications in scientific journals have explored the effects of Covid-19 vaccinations, in South Africa and globally, the social aspects of the vaccination rollout remain underexplored, particularly concerning the scientists and medical officials who were responsible for vaccine development. This article analyses the insights and experiences of vaccine trial investigators and other healthcare workers in South Africa. The study is based on in-depth, qualitative interviews conducted with 16 trial investigators and participants in three provinces – the Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng – as well as with recipients and providers of the vaccine. Sisonke, meaning ‘together’ in isiZulu, is one of the most ambitious public health endeavours yet pursued in South Africa. Initially targeting frontline healthcare workers and then a more broadly defined notion of ‘healthcare worker’, the vaccination trial brought almost half a million South Africans into a new ‘experimental order’, facilitated by a consortium of vaccine providers. Crucially, the Sisonke trial was conducted largely through the same healthcare system that provided public treatment for another pandemic of communicable disease: HIV. Collaborations built in the struggle against the HIV/AIDS pandemic provided a critical framework upon which partners built the response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Hodes, 2024. "Sisonke: A Critical Appraisal of South Africa’s Covid-19 Vaccine Trial," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 901-916, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:50:y:2024:i:6:p:901-916
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2024.2492503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2024.2492503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2024.2492503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:50:y:2024:i:6:p:901-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.