IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjsbxx/v19y2017i5p524-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Mainstreaming towards the Mediterranean: the Case of the ENP

Author

Listed:
  • Serena Giusti

Abstract

This article explores how the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) has supported policies promoting the improvement of women’s conditions in Mediterranean countries. It points out the evolution of the European Union’s gender mainstreaming in the various manifestations of its external policies directed to the region. Gender mainstreaming has been pursued through the usual practice, largely used in recent enlargements: norm diffusion. This method does not allow for a reconceptualization of the policies issued: partners only have the possibility of deciding the pace of implementation of a set of goals selected among those recommended by the EU. The 2011 wave of turmoil on the southern shores of the Mediterranean has contributed to refocusing the EU’s actions on women. The new framework for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment delivered in 2016 has established that gender equality will be mainstreamed through all the EU’s external policies. Although efforts have been made to appraise it, the EU’s gender strategy has mostly failed to confront the structural causes of inequality. It has mainly focused on the external aspects of the question while underestimating cultural, domestic and familial impediments and neglecting national debates or the contributions of local feminists. The EU’s gender mainstreaming remains a unidirectional policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Giusti, 2017. "Gender Mainstreaming towards the Mediterranean: the Case of the ENP," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 524-540, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:19:y:2017:i:5:p:524-540
    DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2017.1296259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19448953.2017.1296259
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19448953.2017.1296259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:19:y:2017:i:5:p:524-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjsb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.