IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v29y2025i3-4p369-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forging unity, marking distinction: Mumbai’s middle-class tenants’ struggles for defending rent control in the post-liberalisation era

Author

Listed:
  • Paankhi Agrawal

Abstract

Middle-class sections in India have faced threats of eviction and displacement due to transformations in the built environment and the legal regime regulating these transformations in the post-liberalisation period. This article is about one such segment of Mumbai’s middle class which has resorted to collective political struggles to defend their right to stay put. These are the protected tenants who came to acquire statutory tenancy rights over a 50-year period due to restrictive rent control protections but have been facing aggravated threats of decontrol since the 1990s. Using contemporary newspaper reports, interviews with tenant-activists and social media posts, I have reconstructed the course of protected tenants’ mobilisations that emerged at two critical moments—1998 and 2015. Drawing insights from Pierre Bourdieu’s work, I could identify a two-pronged classification strategy deployed by tenant-activists to bring about symbolic unification of the heterogeneous sections of the protected tenant base and to mark their distinction from contractual tenants and other housing-insecure groups. Through these struggles, the protected tenants transformed into a political force and played a crucial role in preserving rent control protections in the post-liberalisation period.

Suggested Citation

  • Paankhi Agrawal, 2025. "Forging unity, marking distinction: Mumbai’s middle-class tenants’ struggles for defending rent control in the post-liberalisation era," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3-4), pages 369-387, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:29:y:2025:i:3-4:p:369-387
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2024.2447683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2024.2447683
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2024.2447683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:29:y:2025:i:3-4:p:369-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.