IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v29y2025i1-2p76-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronic peripheralization through urban (re)development in Bucharest: a study of spatial injustice

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Vrăbiescu

Abstract

European funds for urban development often turn into neighborhood surveillance and policing people in vulnerable situations, contributing to the racialized production of space in Bucharest. This article examines the intersection of urban regeneration programs (URPs) and post-socialist public-private dynamics, revealing how URPs preserve spatial injustice in marginalized urban areas. Tackling the case study of the Plumbuita neighborhood in Bucharest, the article explores how restitution laws, ecological neglect, local governance, and EU development funds deepen racial and class divisions. The article argues that the EU Cohesion Policy, intended to support urban development, instead reinforce racialization and marginalization, particularly of Roma communities. By diverting resources toward policing and surveillance rather than social and infrastructural development, URPs exacerbate poverty and exclusion, creating long-lasting spatial injustice. Thus, what was intended for economic, social, and territorial cohesion instead creates chronic peripheralization in certain urban areas. The analysis contributes to urban studies by demonstrating how local governance, legal ambiguities, and neoliberal policies maintain inequalities in urban settings, particularly in Eastern European cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Vrăbiescu, 2025. "Chronic peripheralization through urban (re)development in Bucharest: a study of spatial injustice," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-2), pages 76-98, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:29:y:2025:i:1-2:p:76-98
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2025.2465924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2025.2465924
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2025.2465924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:29:y:2025:i:1-2:p:76-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.