IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v21y2017i2p164-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban ethnography and the margins at the centre

Author

Listed:
  • Tung-Yi Kho

Abstract

Since its designation as China’s first Special Economic Zone, Shenzhen has become an important symbol of post-Mao China. This has involved the institutionalisation of the market as the preponderant mode of social organisation, accompanied by the faith that it would produce unprecedented wealth for all. Against this background Shenzhen has become a city where Chinese dreams are thought to be realised and, hence, a major destination for rural migrants in search of a ‘better’ life—the ‘good life’, so to speak. My ethnographic project in Shenzhen seeks to examine different views of what such a way of life might consist of. This has raised questions of how such an ethnographic investigation should be actualised, how the field defined, where the city sits vis-à-vis its margins, and what constitutes Shenzhen and what is out of bounds. At stake in the ethnographic undertaking is the fundamental question about ‘truth claims’ and how we come to them. Ethnography as ‘a return to the things themselves’ has the potential to offer an account of things ‘as they are’. Drawing from 30 months of research in Shenzhen, this paper details my ethnographic experience and reveals how knowing is foremost a corporeal affair. One has to be in situ to experience and know ‘the city’ and ‘its margins’.

Suggested Citation

  • Tung-Yi Kho, 2017. "Urban ethnography and the margins at the centre," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 164-177, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:164-177
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1353339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2017.1353339
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2017.1353339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:164-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.