IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v17y2013i5p636-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EUtopia? The European Union and the Parlamentarium in Brussels

Author

Listed:
  • Caspar Pearson

Abstract

This paper explores the European Parliament's new visitors' centre in Brussels, the Parlamentarium. It examines how the Parlamentarium and its displays might be related to various conceptions of European Union (EU) territoriality, mediating between an 'informational' conception of the EU and one that is grounded in a more traditional idea of place. The paper argues that the Parlamentarium seeks to make sense of the multi-centred, multi-scaled spatial organisation that characterises the EU and that, by promoting the notion of an extensive European cityspace , it attempts to create for the EU a compelling visual and spatial imaginary. In some senses, the Parlamentarium might be seen to take on the functions of the capital city that the EU lacks. The paper also explores a number of contradictions and points of tension within the Parlamentarium, noting that it seems to be a constitutional centre without a constitution, and a place in which meaning appears to be fragmentary and fleeting. Examining the 'televisual' aspect of many of the displays, the paper argues that the exhibition both promotes the European ideal of unity in diversity and, simultaneously, casts doubt upon it. The Parlamentarium seeks to act as an agent for the creation of European subjectivity. Whether the type of postmodern imagery that it deploys is sufficient for this task remains open to question.

Suggested Citation

  • Caspar Pearson, 2013. "EUtopia? The European Union and the Parlamentarium in Brussels," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 636-653, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:17:y:2013:i:5:p:636-653
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2013.827862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2013.827862
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2013.827862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:17:y:2013:i:5:p:636-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.