IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v14y2010i3p234-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The urban impossible: A eulogy for the unfinished city

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Chatterton

Abstract

This paper extends the debate on the right to the city through the idea of the urban impossible. The starting premise is the fundamental and age‐old question—what actually is a city, what do we want it to be and who should be involved in its making? The right to the city is not just a movement for material rights, but also the right to shape, intervene and participate in the unfolding idea of the city. Cities, then, are living organic, conflictual entities that are constantly remade and recast in thousands of ways through everyday encounters. In different moments, new possibilities for radically different cities open up. The city, then, is an unfinished, expansive and unbounded story. The urban impossible demands a much wider political imaginary to intervene in the unfolding story of the city and calls for a radical appetite for change to inform the work of urban researchers. The agenda becomes not so much about what the city currently is or what it was, but more about what it could become, what it has never been. I outline some directions that this kind of research agenda needs to take; in particular, the need to develop a broad critique of the urban growth machine and developing processes and mechanisms for more participatory and direct forms of urban democracy. This is the urban impossible: being simultaneously within, against and beyond the current urban condition. Like an Alice in Wonderland who has found herself in the city, we need to dream six impossible cities before breakfast.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Chatterton, 2010. "The urban impossible: A eulogy for the unfinished city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 234-244, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:234-244
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2010.482272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2010.482272
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2010.482272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mine Eder & Özlem Öz, 2015. "Neoliberalization of Istanbul's Nightlife: Beer or Champagne?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 284-304, March.
    2. David Pinder, 2015. "Reconstituting the Possible: Lefebvre, Utopia and the Urban Question," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 28-45, January.
    3. Joanna Sage & Darren Smith & Philip Hubbard, 2013. "New-build Studentification: A Panacea for Balanced Communities?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2623-2641, October.
    4. Nathan McClintock & Christiana Miewald & Eugene McCann, 2021. "GOVERNING URBAN AGRICULTURE: Formalization, Resistance and Re‐visioning in Two ‘Green’ Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 498-518, May.
    5. Andrew Warren & Chris Gibson, 2011. "Blue-Collar Creativity: Reframing Custom-Car Culture in the Imperilled Industrial City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(11), pages 2705-2722, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:234-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.