IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cipsxx/v30y2025i1-2p54-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowing urban nature differently: undervalued nature relationships linked to community parks in the City of Tshwane

Author

Listed:
  • Dayle Lesley Shand
  • Christina Breed

Abstract

Adopted colonial ideologies of ‘protecting nature’ for exclusive use by ‘white’ European settlers to the detriment of local Indigenous communities, have had far reaching consequences for how residents engage with nature in South Africa. Expanding on research seeking locally appropriate conceptualizations of nature, we ask from a landscape architectural perspective: How can local narratives about urban nature places, such as parks, support more inclusive landscape design in cities? Drawing on data collected from three phases of ethnographic research, totaling 52 interviews, and over 50 site visits, we introduce place-specific interpretations of nature benefits for the City of Tshwane. We present three identified ‘cultural ecosystem services’ centered around socio-economic benefits, gendered and generational use of space, and the extensions of home and sense of belonging. The findings show the place-specificity of human-nature relationships in urban settings and illustrate undervalued relationships neglected in landscape design, which challenge current municipal processes and legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayle Lesley Shand & Christina Breed, 2025. "Knowing urban nature differently: undervalued nature relationships linked to community parks in the City of Tshwane," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1-2), pages 54-69, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:30:y:2025:i:1-2:p:54-69
    DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2025.2465762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2025.2465762
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563475.2025.2465762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:30:y:2025:i:1-2:p:54-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cips20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.