IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cipsxx/v17y2012i2p147-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justice as Fairness in Planning Policy-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen McKay
  • Michael Murray
  • Sean Macintyre

Abstract

This paper considers a moral basis for planning theory and endeavours to establish principles of justice which might be relevant to the regulation of development. Whilst the investigation recognizes that there is a need for a deeper understanding of the dynamics of governance, it suggests that many of the inefficiencies, inequities and public disquiet concerns relating to planning centre on a drift from a perception that the system is both fair and just, and that practice needs to be anchored on founding values concerned with redistribution and equality. In this context, John Rawls’ theory of justice is employed as a vehicle to capture moral ideas of equality and liberty within a constitutional democracy and as a basis for scrutinizing emerging justice-based issues which impact upon planning. Using National Policy Statements as a case study, the paper concludes that, whilst there are serious concerns over current policy-making practices, the principles of justice offer a foundation for practical critique which can help overcome problems of mistrust.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen McKay & Michael Murray & Sean Macintyre, 2012. "Justice as Fairness in Planning Policy-Making," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 147-162.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:17:y:2012:i:2:p:147-162
    DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2012.672798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2012.672798
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563475.2012.672798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:17:y:2012:i:2:p:147-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cips20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.