IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cijwxx/v34y2018i6p848-868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating media framing and public reactions in the context of a water reuse proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Goodwin
  • Marie Raffin
  • Paul Jeffrey
  • Heather M. Smith

Abstract

The public is increasingly engaging with information about water reuse proposals through the Internet. Though there are benefits to engaging the public online, there may also be challenges associated with media bias or online advocacy. This study qualitatively examines the public response (online comments, n = 1323) to online news reporting an indirect potable reuse proposal for London. The study found no evidence of the media’s framing of the event strongly shaping the unsolicited online public reactions. Findings suggest that though communications may struggle to counter longer-term news agendas, there may be benefits to experimenting with framing water safety measures and shorter-term gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Goodwin & Marie Raffin & Paul Jeffrey & Heather M. Smith, 2018. "Evaluating media framing and public reactions in the context of a water reuse proposal," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 848-868, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cijwxx:v:34:y:2018:i:6:p:848-868
    DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2017.1347085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07900627.2017.1347085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07900627.2017.1347085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cijwxx:v:34:y:2018:i:6:p:848-868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cijw20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.