IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v41y2026i6p1406-1426.html

Urban politics on housing policy transformation in Indonesia: an institutional perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Dian Rahmawati
  • Deden Rukmana

Abstract

This study develops a model of urban politics on public policy transformation using an institutionalist perspective, examining Indonesia’s inclusionary housing policy. It addresses the question: to what extent does the interplay between public and private sector actors influence affordable housing policy in Indonesia? Urban politics is examined through the evolving interplay among key actors involved in housing provision. We argue that these dynamics shape the design and implementation of the Lingkungan Hunian Berimbang (LHB) regulation as Indonesia’s key inclusionary housing policy which has endured for over three decades. Using interviews and content analysis of regulations and reports, we observe policy shifts shaped by changing institutional logics: from state-driven mandates to market-oriented governance. Our findings demonstrate how neoliberalism has reconfigured housing policy, with increasing reliance on private sector participation. This study contributes to understanding how institutional change and political negotiations transform housing policy frameworks, highlighting the strategic role of urban politics in shaping affordable housing outcomes in the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian Rahmawati & Deden Rukmana, 2026. "Urban politics on housing policy transformation in Indonesia: an institutional perspective," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 1406-1426, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:6:p:1406-1426
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2025.2552404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2025.2552404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2025.2552404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:6:p:1406-1426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.