IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v41y2026i4p844-869.html

Choice denied: impact of income and credit-based tenant screening on the Housing Choice Voucher program

Author

Listed:
  • Wonyoung So
  • Anisha Gade
  • Forrest Hangen

Abstract

The Housing Choice Voucher program supports over 2.5 million households by subsidizing rent payments within the private housing market. However, challenges arise due to exclusionary practices, undermining the program’s goal of ‘choice.’ Tenant screening practices have been critical in exacerbating these challenges, yet their impact remains understudied. Drawing on tenant screening criteria documents from property management websites and the Survey of Consumer Finances, this study finds that while voucher holders generally meet rent-to-income thresholds due to the subsidies—keeping their rent burden relative to their income, they still face barriers related to credit scores, bankruptcy history, and debt. These criteria, which apply to both voucher and non-voucher renters, may exclude approximately one in ten voucher holders, despite the guaranteed portion of rent covered by public assistance. These findings show an urgent need for policy interventions to the potential exclusionary impacts of tenant screening services.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonyoung So & Anisha Gade & Forrest Hangen, 2026. "Choice denied: impact of income and credit-based tenant screening on the Housing Choice Voucher program," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 844-869, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:4:p:844-869
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2025.2498385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2025.2498385
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2025.2498385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:4:p:844-869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.