IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v41y2026i4p762-784.html

Feeding [off] the frenzy: a case study of platform influence on housing mortgage transactions in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Esbitt

Abstract

Australian households, despite stagnated wages and job precarity, accept the prevailing neoliberal discourse promoting housing ownership facilitated by debt as their ‘path to wealth’. The resultant housing ‘frenzy’ fuels a volatile situation of high housing prices and household indebtedness, with low housing affordability and increasing social inequality. This paper identifies the strategic repositioning of powerful media as influential players in housing finance in a financialised yet weakly-regulated environment, through a study of a mortgage portal embedded in Australia’s predominant property platform, realestate.com.au. It reveals how digital media company REA Group, majority-owned by media conglomerate News Corporation, acquired mortgage brokerages and bank partnerships, using their portal to direct millions of Australians to lending in which they have a pecuniary interest, while controlling the discourse and harvesting data. The interdisciplinarity of this initiative has left it under-researched and overlooked by scholars and policy-makers. This mixed-methods case study extends the integration of media in housing studies and alerts readers to its compelling implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Esbitt, 2026. "Feeding [off] the frenzy: a case study of platform influence on housing mortgage transactions in Australia," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 762-784, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:4:p:762-784
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2025.2498383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2025.2498383
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2025.2498383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:4:p:762-784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.