IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v41y2026i1p50-70.html

Understanding the intersectional stigma of ageing, disability, and place: a systematic literature mapping review

Author

Listed:
  • Kim McKee
  • Vikki McCall
  • Dianne Theakstone
  • Kate Wilson
  • Louise Reid
  • Rose Gilroy
  • David Manley
  • Anna Pearce
  • Lisa Davison
  • Julia Lawrence
  • Alasdair Pemble

Abstract

Stigma is a key concept for social scientists interested in how certain groups in society are judged and treated negatively. Within housing studies this scholarship reflects longstanding interests within the discipline regarding the spatial impacts of social and urban policies on both people, and the places in which they live. We augment these debates by advocating for a more intersectional understanding of how stigma is shaped by identity. It presents findings from a systematic literature mapping review of research that has a combined focus on ageing, disability, place, and stigma across OECD countries. Given global trends around ageing populations and the impacts for health, this is an important, but often neglected aspect to stigma research. Our review highlights the advantages of combining a spatial approach to stigma with intersectional insights foregrounded in age and disability. This includes the further development of stigma as a concept from the perspective of under-represented groups: older and disabled people.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim McKee & Vikki McCall & Dianne Theakstone & Kate Wilson & Louise Reid & Rose Gilroy & David Manley & Anna Pearce & Lisa Davison & Julia Lawrence & Alasdair Pemble, 2026. "Understanding the intersectional stigma of ageing, disability, and place: a systematic literature mapping review," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 50-70, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:50-70
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2024.2421844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2024.2421844
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2024.2421844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:50-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.