IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v40y2025i8p1732-1757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the in-work poor more disadvantaged in urban areas? An analysis of housing affordability in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Colombarolli

Abstract

In Europe, there is growing empirical evidence on the difficulties workers face in making ends meet. High housing costs may compound the picture. This study investigates the housing affordability problems of workers’ households. Drawing on 2019 EU-SILC cross-sectional data for Italy, it examines the extent to which working households’ income results in housing affordability problems, and the differences between cities and rural areas. It considers three groups: in-work poor, low-middle, and high-income households. Results confirm the relevance of the income level as in-work poor households face the lowest housing costs but the highest housing affordability problems. In terms of territorial differences, results show a widespread vulnerability of the in-work poor, especially for tenants: these households have considerable difficulties in coping with housing costs in both urban and rural areas, despite rents being higher in cities. In contrast, the place of living assumes more relevance for low-middle-income households: for them, renting in cities rather than in rural areas is substantially riskier.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Colombarolli, 2025. "Are the in-work poor more disadvantaged in urban areas? An analysis of housing affordability in Italy," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 1732-1757, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:40:y:2025:i:8:p:1732-1757
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2024.2369144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2024.2369144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2024.2369144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:40:y:2025:i:8:p:1732-1757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.