IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v39y2024i2p459-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing asset-based welfare capitalism: wealth inequality, housing finance and household risk

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth Bryant
  • Ben Spies-Butcher
  • Adam Stebbing

Abstract

The financialization of households complicates how we compare housing systems and welfare states. This article explores the shifting relationships between wealth inequality, welfare states and household risk, focussing on the roles of housing and mortgage markets. We show national regimes of capitalism continue to shape experiences of risk, but increasingly through asset-based welfare mechanisms, centred on housing ownership, that are inadequately captured in existing comparative literature. Using OECD data, our argument is developed in two steps. First, we demonstrate that national patterns of wealth inequality do not follow classical welfare state categories, but mean wealth levels do, suggesting a distinct structural relationship. Second, we connect wealth inequality to the risks of housing ownership and household debt, focussing on house price falls in the United States, Italy and Denmark following the 2007–2008 financial crisis. We find mortgage default rates reflect welfare state categories rather than measures of financial risk, revealing an emerging ‘hybrid’ role of social insurance in supporting household liquidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth Bryant & Ben Spies-Butcher & Adam Stebbing, 2024. "Comparing asset-based welfare capitalism: wealth inequality, housing finance and household risk," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 459-480, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:459-480
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2056150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2022.2056150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2022.2056150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:459-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.