IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v39y2024i2p376-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religion’s roles in community integration after homelessness: supportive housing residents’ uses of spiritual practices amid trauma, discrimination, and stigma

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew D. Marr
  • Natália Marques da Silva

Abstract

Background: Integration into a community after homelessness, while often difficult, can foster positive outcomes such as housing retention and improved health. However, research has understudied the roles of spiritual practices in community integration after homelessness. Methods: We conducted a grounded analysis of these processes using qualitative interviews with 27 supportive housing residents in Miami. Results: Even after moving into supportive housing, many of our interviewees grappled with long-term impacts of trauma, discrimination, and stigma, which oftentimes prevented them from joining conventional congregations. While some turned to solitary prayer, others used strategies such as joining alternative congregations, creating new locations of practice, and using technology to sustain social ties and a sense of belonging. Conclusion: We argue that researchers, supportive housing providers, congregation leaders, and administrators should pay more attention to barriers and strategies that impact residents’ ability to practice spirituality in ways that meet existential, emotional, and social needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew D. Marr & Natália Marques da Silva, 2024. "Religion’s roles in community integration after homelessness: supportive housing residents’ uses of spiritual practices amid trauma, discrimination, and stigma," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 376-397, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:376-397
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2056154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2022.2056154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2022.2056154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:376-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.