IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v38y2023i4p597-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Home’ as an essentially contested concept and why this matters

Author

Listed:
  • Jed Meers

Abstract

This paper makes two interlinked arguments. First, that the ‘concept of home’ – the focus of a burgeoning literature within housing studies – meets Gallie’s conditions for an ‘essentially contested concept’. The influential theory, drawn on throughout the social sciences, seeks to explain concepts for which disputes are intractable; they cannot be settled by empirical evidence or argument. Second, that this ‘essential contestability’ is not just a theoretical label, it tells us something useful about how scholars can best employ the concept of home in their own work. The argument is put in three sections. The first provides a summary of Gallie’s theory. The second argues that the concept of home meets Gallie’s conditions for essential contestability. Finally, the third outlines the implications of the arguments put in the first two sections for scholars engaging with the concept of home.

Suggested Citation

  • Jed Meers, 2023. "‘Home’ as an essentially contested concept and why this matters," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 597-614, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:597-614
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2021.1893281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2021.1893281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2021.1893281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:597-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.