IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v38y2023i10p1845-1859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The right to stay put” or “the right to decide”? The question of displacement in the revitalization of Łódź (Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Audycka

Abstract

The aim of this policy review is to present the revitalization policy of the city of Łódź in the context of displacement research. Although historical specificity discouraged aggressive gentrification, and legal regulations provided local governments with tools that helped ensure continuity of tenancy, revitalization results reveal a surprisingly high level of actual and planned displacement, as tenants decide to permanently leave their neighbourhoods. The study examines the issue of displacement in the context of housing conditions, characterized by a large share but low quality of public housing, and progressive regulatory environment. It describes the practical organization of resettlements in Łódź, their strengths and shortcomings, as well as tenants’ responses. It contributes to research on displacement by showing that revitalization-induced resettlement is positively valued in certain circumstances. It also suggests that the "right to stay put" should be redefined as "the right to decide", but inextricably linked to the task of maintaining a diverse social structure in revitalization areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Audycka, 2023. "“The right to stay put” or “the right to decide”? The question of displacement in the revitalization of Łódź (Poland)," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 1845-1859, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:38:y:2023:i:10:p:1845-1859
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2021.1992358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2021.1992358
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2021.1992358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:38:y:2023:i:10:p:1845-1859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.