IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v37y2022i10p1821-1841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial disparity in exposure to housing cost burden in the United States: 1980–2017

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Hess
  • Gregg Colburn
  • Kyle Crowder
  • Ryan Allen

Abstract

This article uses the Panel Study of Income Dynamics to analyse Black–White differences in housing cost burden exposure among renter households in the USA from 1980 to 2017, expanding understanding of this phenomenon in two respects. Specifically, we document how much this racial disparity changed among renters over almost four decades and identify how much factors associated with income or housing costs explain Black–White inequality in exposure to housing cost burden. For White households, the net contribution of household, neighbourhood and metropolitan covariates accounts for much of the change in the probability of housing cost burden over time. For Black households, however, the probability of experiencing housing cost burden continued to rise throughout the period of this study, even after controlling for household, neighbourhood and metropolitan covariates. This suggests that unobserved variables like racial discrimination, social networks or employment quality might explain the increasing disparity in cost burden among for Black and White households in the USA.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Hess & Gregg Colburn & Kyle Crowder & Ryan Allen, 2022. "Racial disparity in exposure to housing cost burden in the United States: 1980–2017," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1821-1841, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:37:y:2022:i:10:p:1821-1841
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1807473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2020.1807473
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2020.1807473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:37:y:2022:i:10:p:1821-1841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.