IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v33y2018i6p938-959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public choice theory and rental housing: an examination of rental housing contracts in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Owusu-Ansah
  • Derick Ohemeng-Mensah
  • Raymond Talinbe Abdulai
  • Franklin Obeng-Odoom

Abstract

This paper extends both the literature on rental housing in Ghana and the global literature on the critique of public choice analyses in terms of focus, methods and positioning. It argues that, contrary to the assumption that all housing policy changes are driven by internal national processes, in the case of Ghana at least, neither tenants (through their use of their greater numbers) nor landlords (through the use of their stronger financial and hence political power) exclusively influence housing policy. Both parties have some power, but landlords use theirs to change rents arbitrarily and decide whom to invite or keep as tenants, whilst tenants seek to use their power by lodging complaints with the state, albeit to little effect as the power of landlords is overwhelming. There is a strong basis to call into question the public choice argument that it is fair for landlords to extract windfall rent from tenants since their efforts or talents do not increase rent.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Owusu-Ansah & Derick Ohemeng-Mensah & Raymond Talinbe Abdulai & Franklin Obeng-Odoom, 2018. "Public choice theory and rental housing: an examination of rental housing contracts in Ghana," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 938-959, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:33:y:2018:i:6:p:938-959
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2017.1408783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2017.1408783
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2017.1408783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:33:y:2018:i:6:p:938-959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.