IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v30y2015i6p817-838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Representations of Gentrification in Amsterdam and Berlin: A Marginal Process?

Author

Listed:
  • Cody Hochstenbach

Abstract

In recent years, several studies have highlighted how gentrification strategies are imposed under the discursive umbrella of 'social mixing'. However, most evidence is based on Anglo-Saxon experiences. This paper sets out to expand the geography of gentrification by looking at the representation of processes and policies of gentrification as put forward by key stakeholders in Nord-Neuk�lln (Berlin) and Indische Buurt (Amsterdam). It shows that in both contexts, stakeholders and policy documents engage with the concept of gentrification, rather than avoid it. Due to public-policy influence and local criticisms, this engagement differs between both cases. In Nord-Neuk�lln, the term is heavily contested and policy-makers attempt to refute accusations of gentrification, while in the Indische Buurt, the process is explicitly pursued as a positive policy instrument by policy-makers. Different representations within each case are shown to be influenced by the characteristics of in-moving and out-moving residents; the employed timeframe and the perceived influence of institutions on urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Cody Hochstenbach, 2015. "Stakeholder Representations of Gentrification in Amsterdam and Berlin: A Marginal Process?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 817-838, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:30:y:2015:i:6:p:817-838
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2014.979770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2014.979770
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2014.979770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivis García & Mérida M Rúa, 2018. "‘Our interests matter’: Puerto Rican older adults in the age of gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(14), pages 3168-3184, November.
    2. Emil van Eck & Iris Hagemans & Jan Rath, 2020. "The ambiguity of diversity: Management of ethnic and class transitions in a gentrifying local shopping street," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3299-3314, December.
    3. Jan Kubeš & Zoltán Kovács, 2020. "The kaleidoscope of gentrification in post-socialist cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(13), pages 2591-2611, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:30:y:2015:i:6:p:817-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.