IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v29y2014i3p407-437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Cohesiveness of Disadvantaged Communities in Urban South Korea: The Impact of the Physical Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Bokyong Seo
  • Rebecca L.H. Chiu

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the physical environment and residents' perception and use of the environment settings on the social cohesiveness of disadvantaged communities in South Korea. Multiple regression and qualitative analysis were applied based on the data collected in four public rental housing estates in Seoul accommodating the lowest income households. This paper argues that social cohesiveness could be operationalised in shared norms and trust, attachment to housing estate and social networking. It was found that the characteristics of social cohesiveness were different across the same type of public rental housing estates, and that this variance was partly due to the different conditions of the physical environment. It was also found that a more positive perception of the physical environment and the more frequent use of facilities generally enhanced community cohesiveness. Desirable land use mix and housing types around the housing estates, preferable community facilities, housing block design and more effective refurbishment programmes within the estates were recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Bokyong Seo & Rebecca L.H. Chiu, 2014. "Social Cohesiveness of Disadvantaged Communities in Urban South Korea: The Impact of the Physical Environment," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 407-437, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:29:y:2014:i:3:p:407-437
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2013.803519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2013.803519
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2013.803519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Zhao & Martin Dijst & Yanwei Chai, 2016. "Between haven and heaven in cities: A comparison between Beijing (China) and Utrecht (the Netherlands)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2469-2487, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:29:y:2014:i:3:p:407-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.