IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v73y2021i6p1010-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Evaluators in Russia: When Academic Citizenship Fails

Author

Listed:
  • Katerina Guba
  • Angelika Tsivinskaya

Abstract

We examined the role of peer review in the quality assurance system developed for the regulation of higher education institutions in Russia. Given their negative attitude towards the state’s attempts to increase control over universities, how can the participation of academics in regulatory activity be explained? This essay applies resource allocation theory to suggest that engagement in academic service might depend on an individual’s performance of their core professional task: research. Results indicate that Russian academics who perform relatively poorly with respect to publications and citations in selective journals are more likely to engage in academic citizenship in the form of inspections.

Suggested Citation

  • Katerina Guba & Angelika Tsivinskaya, 2021. "Evaluating the Evaluators in Russia: When Academic Citizenship Fails," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(6), pages 1010-1036, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:73:y:2021:i:6:p:1010-1036
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1932759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2021.1932759
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2021.1932759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:73:y:2021:i:6:p:1010-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.