IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v70y2018i4p666-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Critical Movement Against the 2010–2012 Education Reform in Russia: Networks, Organisations and Parties

Author

Listed:
  • Mikkel Berg-Nordlie
  • Nikita Bolshakov

Abstract

In 2010, Russian authorities presented a new draft law on education, which immediately became controversial. The essay examines whether user groups (parents) and low-ranking sector employees (teachers) were active in the movement critical of the reform, and how the state responded to the anti-reform movement. The movement consisted of several networks and organisations with no central node. It included teachers, parents and activists from both non-systemic groups and systemic opposition parties. Pressure from below by networks and organisations was combined with pressure from actors situated above in the political system, that is, in the Duma. Since the movement was welfare-oriented rather than fundamentally regime-critical, the Russian authorities tolerated open criticism both from civil society and inside the Duma. Some gains for teachers were won, but the movement’s proposed amendments and demands were generally rejected or only introduced in revised form.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikkel Berg-Nordlie & Nikita Bolshakov, 2018. "The Critical Movement Against the 2010–2012 Education Reform in Russia: Networks, Organisations and Parties," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(4), pages 666-684, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:70:y:2018:i:4:p:666-684
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2018.1471450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2018.1471450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2018.1471450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:70:y:2018:i:4:p:666-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.