IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v69y2017i6p940-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure, Favours, and Vote-buying: Experimental Evidence from Romania and Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Isabela Mares
  • Aurelian Muntean
  • Tsveta Petrova

Abstract

This article examines the mix of non-programmatic strategies used by politicians to gain voter support in contemporary Eastern Europe. We use a mixed-method design that combines survey-based experiments and qualitative research in a paired comparison of localities in Romania and Bulgaria. Our article documents that the mix of clientelistic strategies differs across localities with different turnover rates. In both Romania and Bulgaria, we find that the use of clientelistic strategies that politicise state resources is higher in localities with long-term political incumbents.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabela Mares & Aurelian Muntean & Tsveta Petrova, 2017. "Pressure, Favours, and Vote-buying: Experimental Evidence from Romania and Bulgaria," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(6), pages 940-960, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:69:y:2017:i:6:p:940-960
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2017.1364351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2017.1364351
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2017.1364351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:69:y:2017:i:6:p:940-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.