IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v66y2014i4p511-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Accounts for Party System Stability? Comparing the Dimensions of Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Conor O'Dwyer

Abstract

Why do party systems stabilise quickly in some new democracies while others remain in extended flux? As a core variable of comparative politics, party system stability has led scholars to generate various theoretical explanations, but consensus is still lacking. Given its widely divergent party systems, postcommunist Europe presents an important opportunity to revisit stability's determinants. Applying hypotheses derived from theories about competition in multidimensional policy spaces, I find that they better explain variation in a 14-case sample than contending hypotheses about the electoral system, economic performance, constitutional design, political culture, or previous democratic experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Conor O'Dwyer, 2014. "What Accounts for Party System Stability? Comparing the Dimensions of Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(4), pages 511-535, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:66:y:2014:i:4:p:511-535
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.897430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2014.897430
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2014.897430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:66:y:2014:i:4:p:511-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.