IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v36y2026i4p686-698.html

Caste equity and humanitarian aid: Dalit-led NGO perspectives on Nepal’s 2015 earthquake response

Author

Listed:
  • Bishnu Pariyar

Abstract

This paper examines how neutrality and impartiality operated during Nepal’s 2015 earthquakes and shaped Dalit communities’ access to assistance. Drawing on interviews and organisational documents from ten Dalit-led NGOs, it shows that principles to ensure fairness can, in caste-stratified contexts, reinforce inequality. Neutrality was invoked to sidestep caste discrimination, recasting structural exclusion as a local cultural issue, while impartiality was interpreted as uniform distribution despite unequal losses. Donor practices marginalised Dalit organisations by privileging dominant-caste NGOs, producing tokenistic participation and subcontracted implementation without decision-making power. In contrast, Dalit NGOs developed equity-sensitive, rights-based practices centred on participatory assessment, downward accountability, and reframing relief as citizenship entitlements. The analysis contributes to debates on humanitarian ethics and localisation by identifying mechanisms through which caste hierarchy shapes response, and by foregrounding justice-oriented approaches practised by marginalised actors in Nepal and disaster settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Bishnu Pariyar, 2026. "Caste equity and humanitarian aid: Dalit-led NGO perspectives on Nepal’s 2015 earthquake response," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 686-698, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:4:p:686-698
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2026.2627948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2026.2627948
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2026.2627948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:4:p:686-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.