IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v36y2026i3p606-617.html

Navigating “responsibility” in gender-based violence research: a decolonial feminist reflection

Author

Listed:
  • Lubna Jebin

Abstract

In this paper, I reflect on the ethical and methodological complexities of gender-based violence (GBV) research in Bangladesh from a decolonial feminist lens. Drawing on my doctoral fieldwork experience, I discuss the challenges encountered and strategies for navigating researcher’s “responsibilities”. This reflection highlights the critical role of development researchers in addressing the power dynamics within the research process. In the context of GBV research, responsible practices emphasise the need to minimise power imbalances, uphold participants’ agency, and remain culturally sensitive to the diverse contexts in which participants are situated. Importantly, this paper underscores the value of knowledge that is produced and grounded in the Global South, challenging certain practices that often marginalise these perspectives. My fieldwork experience suggests that responsibility is an iterative and ongoing process of reflection and adaptation that requires researchers’ time, sensitivity, and conscious effort. These practices, aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals, aim to foster an accountable, equitable, and transformative research paradigm within the broader field of international development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lubna Jebin, 2026. "Navigating “responsibility” in gender-based violence research: a decolonial feminist reflection," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 606-617, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:3:p:606-617
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2025.2604180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2025.2604180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2025.2604180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:3:p:606-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.