IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v36y2026i3p462-473.html

Gendered drivers of post-adoption abandonment of rain-fed upland “New Rice for Africa” (NERICA) rice varieties in central Benin

Author

Listed:
  • Tomonori Yokouchi
  • Kazuki Saito

Abstract

This study investigated the post-adoption outcomes of upland “New Rice for Africa” (NERICA) rice dissemination in central Benin. Using a 2016 follow-up survey of 296 smallholders, it traces cultivation patterns after national promotion programs (2006–2010). Although 82 per cent of surveyed farmers cultivated rice in 2011, by 2015, only 28 per cent continued and fewer than 5 per cent retained NERICA. Farmers cited low rainfall, poor soil fertility, and unattractive market prices as major reasons for abandonment, and most shifted to soybean and maize, which are considered more drought-tolerant and profitable. Gender-disaggregated analysis revealed distinct patterns: men farmers who abandoned rice were more likely to have used credit and invested larger sums in agriculture, whereas women farmers who discontinued rice were often farmer group members and had received extension training, factors that had initially facilitated adoption. The findings highlight the importance of climate-sensitive and gender-responsive feasibility assessments, along with continuous post-dissemination evaluations, when promoting improved rice varieties in SSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomonori Yokouchi & Kazuki Saito, 2026. "Gendered drivers of post-adoption abandonment of rain-fed upland “New Rice for Africa” (NERICA) rice varieties in central Benin," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 462-473, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:3:p:462-473
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2026.2615706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2026.2615706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2026.2615706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:3:p:462-473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.