IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v36y2026i2p143-149.html

Bridging the science-policy divide in Bhutan’s agriculture sector: viewpoint

Author

Listed:
  • Kesang Wangchuk
  • Jigme Wangdi

Abstract

In nations with limited resources, policy formulation often relies on anecdotal evidence and personal experiences, resulting in policies that lack a strong empirical foundation. This can lead to severe consequences or create ambiguity and uncertainty in policy implementation. In Bhutan, the relationship between scientists and policymakers remains unclear, posing a major challenge to achieving policy goals in an era where scientific knowledge is increasingly vital. This perspective paper presents the link between research and policy development in Bhutan. It also highlights a flawed policy decision in agricultural research and development, exemplified by the abrupt dissolution of a research institution. Additionally, the paper explores instances where scientific insights have shaped policy decisions, focusing on two case studies: the management of high-altitude grasslands and the promotion of goat farming in rural Bhutan. Through these examples, the paper demonstrates how researchers can strategically engage with policy contexts to time their interventions effectively, leading to significant changes in development policies. Finally, it briefly emphasises the importance of fostering positive relationships with policymakers to strengthen the impact of scientific research on policy formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kesang Wangchuk & Jigme Wangdi, 2026. "Bridging the science-policy divide in Bhutan’s agriculture sector: viewpoint," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 143-149, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:143-149
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2025.2502414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2025.2502414
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2025.2502414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:143-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.