IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v35y2025i6p960-971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defending developmentalism: Indonesia and the politics of the New International Economic Order, 1974–2024

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Rizky M. Umar
  • Farahdiba R. Bachtiar

Abstract

Fifty years after its adoption in 1974, there has been a surge in scholarly and political interest in reviving the New International Economic Order (NIEO) in the contemporary global political economy. This article assesses the legacies of the NIEO by looking at Indonesia’s responses to the NIEO during and after its adoption. We argue that Indonesia’s position towards the NIEO has been characterised by ambivalence, which reflects an intention to defend developmentalism, which has become the main feature of Indonesia’s conception of international economic order since the New Order, and an aspiration to bridge the Global South and the Global North. Indonesia supported the NIEO primarily to defend its extractive developmentalism at home. Nevertheless, Indonesia has re-articulated elements of NIEO in its proposal for “a new world order” to defend its industrial downstreaming policies. This assessment brings lessons to understand the legacies of NIEO for the contemporary international economic order.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Rizky M. Umar & Farahdiba R. Bachtiar, 2025. "Defending developmentalism: Indonesia and the politics of the New International Economic Order, 1974–2024," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 960-971, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:35:y:2025:i:6:p:960-971
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2025.2534143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2025.2534143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2025.2534143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:35:y:2025:i:6:p:960-971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.