IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v35y2025i4p650-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer support groups as a participatory development principle

Author

Listed:
  • Nanki Kaur
  • Iliso Lamakhosikazi
  • David Edmunds
  • Christopher J. Colvin
  • Monwa Magoqi
  • Mandla Majola
  • Madeline Curry
  • Jillian Randolph
  • Alison Swartz
  • Richard Handler
  • Noor Sharif
  • Lauren Taylor
  • Rupa S. Valdez

Abstract

This paper reimagines peer support groups by centring a community’s worldviews. We engage with Iliso Lamakhosikazi, a women’s peer support group in South Africa, through an eight-week qualitative study embedded within nearly a decade of collaborative research. This study, using participatory observations, interviews, and focus groups, reveals how Iliso Lamakhosikazi reimagines peer support groups in terms of sociality, focus, and operational structure. The findings show that embedding development efforts within community worldviews can emphasise collective well-being, enhance relationality, and support broader health and wellness goals. Future efforts should apply empowered participation to reimagine other participatory development principles, such as community gardens and mutual aid groups, grounded in a community’s ways of knowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Nanki Kaur & Iliso Lamakhosikazi & David Edmunds & Christopher J. Colvin & Monwa Magoqi & Mandla Majola & Madeline Curry & Jillian Randolph & Alison Swartz & Richard Handler & Noor Sharif & Lauren Tay, 2025. "Peer support groups as a participatory development principle," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 650-668, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:650-668
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2025.2489567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2025.2489567
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2025.2489567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:650-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.