IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v34y2024i4p437-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The policy–practice gap: a comment on South Africa's land redistribution

Author

Listed:
  • Siphe Zantsi
  • Rudzani Nengovhela

Abstract

Land reforms have been implemented in many parts of the world because of both justice and the attractive developmental policy objectives of improving poor people’s welfare – as the prime beneficiaries. Land reform also facilitates rural economic growth. In some parts of the world, like China and India, there is evidence that land reform has been effective in poverty reduction and in enabling economic growth. However, in other parts of the world, like South Africa, the impact of land reform has been very minimal mainly due to poor policy implementation, which entails inadequate support structures. Using an integrative literature review approach and key policy documents on South Africa’s land reform, this article dissects this policy–practice gap in South Africa’s land redistribution policy and proposes that land redistribution be implemented by a private independent entity to reduce state bureaucracy and inefficiencies and, in turn, improve execution.

Suggested Citation

  • Siphe Zantsi & Rudzani Nengovhela, 2024. "The policy–practice gap: a comment on South Africa's land redistribution," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 437-446, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:34:y:2024:i:4:p:437-446
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2024.2309576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2024.2309576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2024.2309576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:34:y:2024:i:4:p:437-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.