IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v33y2023i5p623-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The reform of freetown port – lessons from Political Economy Analysis (PEA) to make conflict sensitivity more efficient

Author

Listed:
  • Mateo Cabello
  • Claudio Alberti

Abstract

Political Economy Analysis (PEA), which is concerned with the interaction of political and economic processes, is a useful tool to improve the efficiency of development, humanitarian, and peacebuilding practice. However, it has important shortcomings too. Using the reforms in the Port of Freetown as a case study, this paper explores the most important ones while highlighting some of the elements undermining the successful operationalisation of conflict sensitivity. The article suggests that both tools should be mainstreamed within organisations as the first step to improve their effectiveness, which in turn requires a re-thinking of its operational and decision-making structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateo Cabello & Claudio Alberti, 2023. "The reform of freetown port – lessons from Political Economy Analysis (PEA) to make conflict sensitivity more efficient," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 623-632, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:33:y:2023:i:5:p:623-632
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2023.2226368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:33:y:2023:i:5:p:623-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.