IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v22y2012i8p1109-1121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From paternalism to participation: the motivations and understandings of the “developers”

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Green

Abstract

Recently there has been a shift in development discourse from ideas of paternalism to those of participation. Set within the framework of a postmodern critique of development, this paper questions the assumption that the ideas of development still exist in the same discursive space. Using University of East Anglia (UEA) development studies postgraduate students as a case study, it considers why students want to work in development and the manner in which individual students think of and conceptualise the enterprise. It explores the role of postgraduate study in developing a conscientisation needed for truly transformative development.Du paternalisme à la participation : les motivations et manières de voir des « développeurs »Il s'est récemment produit une évolution dans le discours du développement, des idées de paternalisme à celles de participation. Cet article se situe dans le contexte d'une critique postmoderne du développement et met en question la supposition selon laquelle les idées relatives au développement continuent d'exister dans le même espace discursif. En se basant sur les étudiants de troisième cycle en section études de développement de l'University of East Anglia (UEA), il tente de déterminer pourquoi les étudiants souhaitent travailler dans le secteur du développement et la manière dont l'individu appréhende et conceptualise cette entreprise. Il traite du rôle des études de troisième cycle dans l'élaboration d'une prise de conscience nécessaire pour parvenir à un développement vraiment transformateur.Do paternalismo à participação: as motivações e entendimentos dos “desenvolvedores”Recentemente tem havido uma mudança no discurso de desenvolvimento das ideias de paternalismo para aquelas de participação. Inserido em uma estrutura de crítica pós-moderna de desenvolvimento, este artigo questiona os pressupostos de que as ideias de desenvolvimento ainda existem no mesmo espaço discurssivo. Utilizando estudantes de pós-graduação em estudos de desenvolvimento da Universidade de East Anglia (UEA) como estudo de caso, ele avalia por que os estudantes desejam trabalhar na área de desenvolvimento e a maneira pela qual os estudantes individualmente pensam sobre a empreitada e a conceitualizam. O artigo examina o papel do estudo de pós-graduação no desenvolvimento de uma conscientização necessária para o desenvolvimento verdadeiramente transformador.Del paternalismo a la participación: motivos y percepciones de los “promotores del desarrollo”En tiempos recientes se ha producido un cambio en el discurso sobre el desarrollo, de ideas paternalistas a ideas de participación. En el marco de la crítica posmoderna del desarrollo, este ensayo cuestiona el supuesto de que las ideas sobre el desarrollo aún se manejan en el mismo espacio discursivo. Con la participación de estudiantes del posgrado en desarrollo de la Universidad de Anglia Oriental, el ensayo investiga por qué los estudiantes quieren trabajar en desarrollo, qué piensa cada uno individualmente sobre su carrera y cómo la conciben. También analiza el papel de los estudios de posgrado en el fomento de una concientización que conduzca a un desarrollo realmente transformador.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Green, 2012. "From paternalism to participation: the motivations and understandings of the “developers”," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 1109-1121, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:22:y:2012:i:8:p:1109-1121
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2012.714351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2012.714351
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2012.714351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:22:y:2012:i:8:p:1109-1121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.