IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v13y2003i1p57-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The logical framework: An easy escape, a straitjacket, or a useful planning tool?

Author

Listed:
  • Reidar Dale

Abstract

The 'logical framework' and 'logical framework approach' have become widespread planning tools, particularly in donor-assisted projects in developing countries. With its simple format and the clear relationship between variables, the logical framework is helpful for summarising main concerns relating to development schemes. At the same time, the author argues, current conventions limit the framework's usefulness; and he suggests modifications that should substantially enhance its applicability and information-carrying capacity. The logical framework approach seeks to address additional dimensions of planning. However, it is too circumscribed by standardised steps and procedures to be defended as the ubiquitous planning methodology it is commonly held out to be. The 'logical framework approach' is here juxtaposed with a broader and more flexible concept of 'development planning', with which it should not be confused.

Suggested Citation

  • Reidar Dale, 2003. "The logical framework: An easy escape, a straitjacket, or a useful planning tool?," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 57-70, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:13:y:2003:i:1:p:57-70
    DOI: 10.1080/0961452022000037982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0961452022000037982
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0961452022000037982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Ledda & Vittorio Serra & Maria Grazia Gavina Ruiu & Antonietta Bardi & Daniele Trogu & Elisabetta Anna Di Cesare & Andrea De Montis, 2024. "Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation into Sectoral Plans: An Assessment Based on the Logical Framework Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:13:y:2003:i:1:p:57-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.