IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v34y2026i1p177-196.html

Can Germany learn from Ukraine? Resilience in a time of polycrisis

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Burkhardt

Abstract

This contribution to the Forum explores whether Germany has engaged in political learning from Ukraine’s societal resilience amid Russia’s war of aggression since 2022. To answer this question, the article draws on literature about policy diffusion and, in particular, the learning mechanism. It analyzes an original corpus of over 1000 statements from German decision-makers and policy documents from 2016 to 2025. The analysis reveals that although the concept of “resilience” has been referenced more frequently in German political discourse, there is little quantitative or qualitative evidence of direct learning from Ukraine’s experience. Ukraine is primarily discussed in the passive voice as a victim of Russian aggression and recipient of German aid, rather than as an entity from which lessons can be learned. The article concludes that differences in political context, persistence of pre-existing foreign policy ideas, and collective action problems in German policymaking may explain why learning from Ukraine’s resilience has been limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Burkhardt, 2026. "Can Germany learn from Ukraine? Resilience in a time of polycrisis," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 177-196, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:177-196
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2025.2599338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2025.2599338
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2025.2599338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:177-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.