IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v33y2025i3p583-603.html

Participatory budgeting under martial law: the case of Ivano-Frankivsk

Author

Listed:
  • Oleh Brovko
  • Norbert Kersting

Abstract

This article examines how participatory budgeting (PB) in Ivano-Frankivsk adapted under martial law after Russia’s full-scale invasion. Using a single-case design, we trace institutional changes, shifts in selection criteria, and patterns of civic engagement across the 2021–2024 cycles. Despite bans on elections and public assemblies, the city reinstated PB in 2023 and redirected resources to civil defence, energy resilience, and public safety. Participation fell from 54,961 voters (2021) to 42,047 (2023) but rebounded to near pre-war levels in 2024 (53,459). While the process evidences democratic resilience – stable implementation rates and increased allocations – it also shows wartime centralization and reduced transparency (officials-only working group; missing minutes). We operationalize democratic quality via a five-benchmark rubric (openness, rationality, efficiency, effectiveness, integrity) and map documentary evidence to each dimension. The case demonstrates both the possibilities and limits of digitally enabled PB in crisis settings, clarifying how participatory instruments can preserve civic voice while testing accountability under emergency rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleh Brovko & Norbert Kersting, 2025. "Participatory budgeting under martial law: the case of Ivano-Frankivsk," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 583-603, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:583-603
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2025.2573091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2025.2573091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2025.2573091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:583-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.