IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v33y2025i2p533-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scoping review of studies on ruscism: tracing the academic and political evolution of a controversial term

Author

Listed:
  • Serhii Nazarovets

Abstract

This scoping review explores the prevalence and academic discourse surrounding the term “ruscism,” a neologism introduced to describe the ideology underpinning Russia’s geopolitical strategies, particularly its military actions in Ukraine. Originating in the early 1990s and gaining significant traction post-2014, “ruscism” reflects perspectives on Russian authoritarianism and neo-imperialism. Through a comprehensive literature review spanning publications from 2016 to 2024, this study examines the adoption and interpretation of “ruscism” within the academic community. It assesses publication trends, the thematic focus of these papers, and the extent to which Ukrainian scholars have influenced international academic narratives. The findings indicate that while “ruscism” is primarily discussed in Ukrainian scholarly works, its recognition and use in global academia is growing, highlighting a critical avenue for understanding regional conflicts and international relations. The study underscores the challenges and importance of strategic communication in academia concerning geopolitically sensitive topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhii Nazarovets, 2025. "A scoping review of studies on ruscism: tracing the academic and political evolution of a controversial term," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 533-543, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:533-543
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2025.2515076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2025.2515076
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2025.2515076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:533-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.