Author
Listed:
- Carina Hartz
- Franziska Deutsch
- Klaus Boehnke
- Martina Klicperova-Baker
- Ivan Brezina
- Jakub Šrol
- Vladimíra K. Čavojová
- Zoltán Jakab
- Wojciech Przybylski
- Miles R. Maftean
- Agnieszka Turska-Kawa
Abstract
As a relatively stable concept, social cohesion remains a prominent focus of current public discourse. One hope is to find possible solutions or coping strategies for current crises and unstable times. Enhancing social cohesion is one suggestion. A shift to the political right in many European governments, growing support for conspiracy narratives, and anti-democratic tendencies are increasing the urgency for action. The research presented in this article examines the role of social cohesion as a buffer against ill-being and conspiracy mentality. A moderated mediation model was tested in a representative survey study (N > 5,342) in Germany and the Visegrad countries. Results suggest that greater perceived social cohesion is associated with lower levels of detached uncertainty and, in turn, a lower inclination towards conspiracy beliefs. There are differences between countries: Germany, where social cohesion is relatively strong and the level of conspiracy mentality is lower, emerges as profoundly different from Poland, where the conspiracy mentality is much stronger. In Poland, the importance of perceived social cohesion in predicting conspiracy beliefs is weaker than in all other countries. Different religiosity levels in the five countries will likely be the basis for cross-national differences.
Suggested Citation
Carina Hartz & Franziska Deutsch & Klaus Boehnke & Martina Klicperova-Baker & Ivan Brezina & Jakub Šrol & Vladimíra K. Čavojová & Zoltán Jakab & Wojciech Przybylski & Miles R. Maftean & Agnieszka Turs, 2025.
"Social cohesion and the inclination towards conspiracy mentality: comparing Germany and the Visegrad countries,"
Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 375-401, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:375-401
DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2025.2511093
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:375-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.