IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v33y2025i1p31-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-kitsch, or how to make a socialist doily: DIY, folk art, and “open” materialities in late-socialist Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolette Makovicky

Abstract

This article explores the promotion of amateur “folk art” production in the Slovak Normalization-era, lifestyle magazines Dorka and Linia. Scholarship on socialist-era DIY, consumption, and material culture shows that socialist modernity was characterized by a culture of making and repair which relied on the knowledge, skill, and labour of citizens. I argue that the amateur production of “folk art” was an integral part of this culture in late-socialist Slovakia, forming a specific type of material practice which deserves to be studied in its own right. Focusing on projects of vernacular embroidery in Dorka and Linia, I show how the Normalization-era authorities promoted the physical recreation of vernacular culture as an ideologically correct way of incorporating pre-socialist rural traditions into modern socialist interiors and lifestyles. Such projects constituted a type of socialist “aesthetic education,” teaching women how to distinguish “good taste” from kitsch. This official valorization of amateur “folk art” production was accompanied by a particular idea of gendered citizenship, and broader ideological lessons in materialist thinking which encourage socialist citizens to engage in the self-conscious creation of their material environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolette Makovicky, 2025. "Anti-kitsch, or how to make a socialist doily: DIY, folk art, and “open” materialities in late-socialist Slovakia," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 31-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:31-45
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2025.2476859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2025.2476859
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2025.2476859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:31-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.