IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v33y2025i1p147-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Albanian Left. Exploration of its paradigm of values and democracy outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Çullhaj

Abstract

This article examines two key theoretical principles of John Rawls—equality and social justice—and their implications for democracy and the Albanian Left. At the heart of the analysis is Rawls’ seminal work, A Theory of Justice (TJ), which Norberto Bobbio identified as a synthesis of liberalism and socialism with a strong normative foundation. Scholars have lauded Rawls for reinvigorating political philosophy after its long stagnation since John Stuart Mill’s Reflections on Representative Government (1861). His work also integrates the political insights of Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651) and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689), establishing a key reference for modern political thought. The article is structured into four sections. The first critically examines equality and social justice as a guiding framework for the Albanian Left. The second applies Bobbio’s liberal-socialist dyad to the Rawls-Nozick debate on the state’s role. The third explores issues in Albanian politics, including corruption, polarization, and governance challenges. Finally, the fourth section assesses Albania’s democratic consolidation. By engaging with Rawls’ theoretical contributions and their local relevance, this study aims to offer a nuanced perspective on democracy and the ideological positioning of the Albanian Left.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Çullhaj, 2025. "The Albanian Left. Exploration of its paradigm of values and democracy outcomes," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 147-165, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:147-165
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2025.2466901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2025.2466901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2025.2466901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:147-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.