IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v29y2021i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential centrifugal effects of majoritarian features in proportional electoral systems

Author

Listed:
  • Christian B. Jensen
  • Daniel J. Lee

Abstract

Many scholars argue that proportional representation (PR) has fragmenting and polarizing effects on party systems (centrifugal effects), while the use of single-member districts has moderating effects (centripetal effects). Beyond these two extremes, in order to combat the potential negative consequences of fragmentation and polarization on government, PR systems can incorporate majoritarian features as a moderating influence. We examine this relationship by considering the conditions under which majoritarian features can backfire and contribute to a more extreme government. We present a theoretical example to illustrate this effect across a range of majoritarian rules and highlight the importance of coordination. To stress that our example is not simply a theoretical possibility, we discuss the cases of Poland (2015), Hungary (2014), and Greece (2015), which incorporate majoritarian features through, respectively, a high election threshold, single-member districts, and bonus seats to the plurality winner. We argue that these elements in each case contributed to the legislative power of extreme, populist parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian B. Jensen & Daniel J. Lee, 2021. "Potential centrifugal effects of majoritarian features in proportional electoral systems," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:29:y:2021:i:1:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2021.1928879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2021.1928879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2021.1928879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:29:y:2021:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.