IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v27y2019i2-3p173-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining and tackling unregistered employment: evidence from an employers’ survey

Author

Listed:
  • Colin C Williams
  • Slavko Bezeredi

Abstract

When explaining and tackling employers participation in the informal economy, they have been conventionally viewed as rational economic actors who engage when the benefits outweigh the costs, and thus their participation is deterred by increasing the sanctions and/or risks of detection. An emergent social actor approach, however, has explained employers as engaging in the informal economy when there is a lack of vertical trust (i.e., their norms, values and beliefs are not in symmetry with the relevant laws and regulations) and horizontal trust (i.e., they believe many others are being non-compliant). The aim of this paper is to evaluate these competing perspectives by reporting a 2015 survey of 450 employers in FYR Macedonia. The finding is that although there is no association between employers using unregistered workers and the perceived level of penalties and risks of detection, there is a strong significant association with both the level of vertical and horizontal trust. Those whose beliefs do not align with the laws and regulations display a significantly greater likelihood of employing unregistered workers, as do those who perceive a larger proportion of the population to be engaged in the informal economy. The theoretical and policy implications are then discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin C Williams & Slavko Bezeredi, 2019. "Explaining and tackling unregistered employment: evidence from an employers’ survey," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2-3), pages 173-189, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:27:y:2019:i:2-3:p:173-189
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2019.1694254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2019.1694254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2019.1694254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:27:y:2019:i:2-3:p:173-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.