IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdanxx/v42y2026i2p364-394.html

An appraisal of the Philippines’ self-reliant defence posture under the Duterte administration

Author

Listed:
  • Julio S. Amador
  • Deryk Matthew N. Baladjay

Abstract

The Philippines continues to grapple with complex internal and external security challenges, ranging from urban insurgencies to maritime territorial disputes. Evolving internal and external threats have prompted the Philippine government to pursue capability upgrades through a dual-track approach: modernising the AFP and reinforcing security alliances, most notably with the United States. While this two-pronged strategy has provided immediate relief, its long-term sustainability remains questionable due to persistent institutional bottlenecks, reliance on foreign partners, and unclear alignment with national security objectives. Against this backdrop, the revival of the Self-Reliant Defence Posture (SRDP) programme under the Duterte administration presents an alternative path towards a more autonomous and sustainable defence framework. This study assesses the SRDP as both a policy concept and an operational doctrine, situating it within the broader dynamics of alliance management and defence modernisation. Drawing from comparative cases of self-reliant defence initiatives worldwide, it argues that a genuinely Filipino self-reliance model requires the integration of state institutions, private sector industries, research and development ecosystems, and a skilled workforce, supported by enabling laws and procurement mechanisms. By examining the implementation of the SRDP between 2016 and 2022 under the Duterte administration, the study identifies critical gaps and strategic opportunities that could shape the future trajectory of Philippine defence policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio S. Amador & Deryk Matthew N. Baladjay, 2026. "An appraisal of the Philippines’ self-reliant defence posture under the Duterte administration," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 364-394, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:364-394
    DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2025.2555786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2025.2555786
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14751798.2025.2555786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:364-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.