IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdanxx/v42y2026i2p325-344.html

The conundrum of modernising Polish Armed Forces: Polish decision-makers between co-operation and polarisation (2011–2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Łukasz Stach
  • Paolo Pizzolo

Abstract

Since 2011, Poland has alternated between governments led by the liberal-left Civic Platform (PO), the right-wing populist, national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS), and coalition governments, each adopting distinct approaches to military spending shaped by political priorities, strategic imperatives, and technological capacity. Amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, as the principal NATO actor on the Alliance's eastern flank, Poland's military modernisation has become increasingly important in academic scholarship. This article traces the convergences/divergences occurred over the last thirteen years in Poland relative to military spending policies and priorities. Specifically, it investigates whether the PO's pro-European and the PiS's Eurosceptic and pro-Atlanticist posture reflected different strategies in terms of arms procurement policies. Moreover, it assesses Poland's success in transforming the Polish Armed Forces into a modern, credible pillar of NATO's security architecture in Central and Eastern Europe – or whether strategic shortcomings continue to hinder their capacity for deterrence and regional stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Łukasz Stach & Paolo Pizzolo, 2026. "The conundrum of modernising Polish Armed Forces: Polish decision-makers between co-operation and polarisation (2011–2024)," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 325-344, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:325-344
    DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2025.2582938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2025.2582938
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14751798.2025.2582938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:325-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.