IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdanxx/v41y2025i4p714-730.html

Exploring the limitations of the UAE’s hard power

Author

Listed:
  • Huzeyfe Altiok
  • Ali Bakir

Abstract

This research investigates why the United Arab Emirates, despite substantial defence expenditures, cannot achieve and project sustainable autonomous hard power. Employing a small state theoretical framework and qualitative methodology, our analysis reveals three fundamental barriers constraining the UAE's military independence. First, demographic limitations force reliance on expatriate military personnel, compromising unit cohesion and loyalty while creating operational vulnerabilities. Second, technological shortcomings necessitate continued dependence on foreign weapons systems, training programmes, and expertise, undermining strategic autonomy. Third, regional positioning between Iran and Saudi Arabia generates security dilemmas that restrict hard power projection and escalate threat perceptions. The study demonstrates that small states might acquire impressive military arsenals through financial investment, yet structural constraints prevent the development of indigenous hard power that would provide genuine military effectiveness. These findings advance small state theory by revealing how population size, technological dependency, and geographic location interact to limit the creation and projection of autonomous hard power.

Suggested Citation

  • Huzeyfe Altiok & Ali Bakir, 2025. "Exploring the limitations of the UAE’s hard power," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 714-730, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:41:y:2025:i:4:p:714-730
    DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2025.2548656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2025.2548656
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14751798.2025.2548656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:41:y:2025:i:4:p:714-730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.